B. Abrahamsson, The logic of organizations, 1993.
DOI : 10.4135/9781483326146

G. Ahuja and R. Et-katila, Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study, Strategic Management Journal, pp.197-220, 2001.
DOI : 10.1002/smj.157

F. Allard-poesi, C. Drucker-godard, and S. Et-ehlinger, « Analyses de représentations et de discours, Méthodes de recherche en management, pp.492-518, 2007.

R. C. Allen, Collective invention, « Collective invention, pp.1-1, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9

K. Angué, « Rôle et place de l'abduction dans la création de connaissances et dans la méthode scientifique peircienne, Recherches qualitatives, pp.2-65, 2009.

B. Aschhoff and T. Schmidt, Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation???Happy Together?, Review of Industrial Organization, vol.12, issue.5, pp.1-41, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s11151-008-9179-7

W. R. Ashby, An introduction to cybernetics, 1956.

M. Avenier and M. Et-gavard-perret, « Inscrire son projet de recherche dans un cadre épistémologique, Méthodologie de la recherche en sciences de gestion. Réussir son mémoire ou sa thèse, pp.11-62, 2012.

M. Avenier and C. Thomas, « A quoi sert l'épistémologie dans la recherche en sciences de gestion? Un débat revisité », Le Libellio d'Aegis, pp.4-13, 2012.

R. Bahemia, Open innovation within new product development projects: evidence from UK manufacturing firms, 2012.

K. D. Bailey, Sociology and the new systems theory : toward a theoretical synthesis, 1994.

A. Barajas, E. Huergo, and L. Et-moreno, Measuring the Impact of International R&D Cooperation: The Case of Spanish Firms Participating in the EU Framework Programme, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1823266

A. Barge-gil, Open, Semi-Open and Closed Innovators: Towards an Explanation of Degree of Openness, Industry & Innovation, vol.149, issue.6, pp.6-577, 2010.
DOI : 10.2307/1556420

S. R. Barley, The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.35, issue.1, pp.61-103, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/2393551

H. Bergson, Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion, 1932.
DOI : 10.14375/NP.9782369434184

G. Berkhout, P. V. Duin, D. Hartmann, and R. Et-ortt, The cyclic nature of innovation : connecting hard sciences with soft values Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth, 2007.

H. R. Bernard, Social research methods : qualitative and quantitative approaches, 2000.

H. R. Bernard and G. W. Et-ryan, Analyzing qualitative data : systematic approaches, 2010.

L. Bertalanffy and . Von, General Systems Theory: Foundations, Developments, Applications, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol.4, issue.6, 1968.
DOI : 10.1109/TSMC.1974.4309376

R. Bhaskar, A realist theory of science, 1975.

N. Blaikie, Designing social research, 2010.

J. R. Blau and W. Mckinley, Ideas, Complexity, and Innovation, Ideas, complexity, and innovation, pp.200-219, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/2392494

P. M. Blau, A Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations, American Sociological Review, vol.35, issue.2, pp.2-201, 1970.
DOI : 10.2307/2093199

P. M. Blau, On the nature of organizations, 1983.

P. M. Blau, The organization of academic work, 1973.

P. M. Blau and R. A. Et-schoenherr, The structure of organizations, 1971.

H. R. Boeije, Analysis in qualitative research, 2010.

J. Bréda and S. Et-moreau, « P&G annonce deux nouveaux objectifs pour son programme d'innovation ouverte « Connect + Develop » : tripler l'impact de ses partenariats externes et devenir un partenaire de premier plan pour tous les acteurs de l'innovation », 2010.

S. Bröring and P. Et-herzog, Organising new business development: open innovation at Degussa, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol.11, issue.3, pp.330-348, 2008.
DOI : 10.1108/14601060810888991

J. S. Brown and I. J. Et-hagel, « Creation nets : getting the most from open innovation », The McKinsey Quarterly, n°2, pp.41-51, 2006.

S. Brunswicker, An empirical multivariate examination of the performance impact of open and collaborative innovation strategies, 2011.

P. Bruyne, H. J. De, M. Et-schoutheete, and . De, Dynamique de la recherche en sciences sociales : les pôles de la pratique méthodologique, 1974.

J. Bughin, M. Chui, and B. Et-johnson, « The next step in open innovation », The McKinsey Quarterly, pp.1-8, 2008.

M. Bunge, Scientific research, Studies in the foundations methodology and philosophy of science, 1967.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-48135-2

T. Burns and G. M. Et-stalker, The management of innovation, 1961.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198288787.001.0001

C. B. Hester and P. , « Unraveling future research : an analysis of emergent literature in open innovation, Annals of Innovation & Entrepreneurship, vol.1, pp.1-11, 2010.

Y. Caloghirou, S. Ioannides, and N. S. Et-vonortas, Research Joint Ventures, Research joint ventures, pp.541-570, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6419.00204

D. T. Campbell and J. C. Stanley, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, 1966.

L. B. Cardinal, Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development, Organization Science, vol.12, issue.1, pp.1-19, 2001.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119

W. B. Carlson, « Innovation and the modern corporation. From heroic invention to industrial science Companion to science in the twentieth century, pp.203-226, 2003.

S. Catellin, « L'abduction : une pratique de la découverte scientifique et littéraire », Hermès, n°39 -Critique de la raison numérique, pp.179-185, 2004.

A. D. Chandler, Strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise, 1962.

S. Charreire and F. Et-durieux, « Explorer et tester : deux voies pour la recherche, Méthodes de recherche en management, pp.57-81, 2003.

S. Charreire and I. Et-huault, « Le constructivisme dans la pratique de recherche : une évaluation à partir de seize thèses de doctorat, pp.3-31, 2001.

H. W. Chesbrough, Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, 2003.

H. W. Chesbrough, « Open innovation : a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation Open innovation : researching a new paradigm, pp.1-12, 2006.

H. Chesbrough and S. Et-brunswicker, « Managing open innovation in large firms, 2013.

H. Chesbrough and A. K. Et-crowther, Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries, R&D Management, pp.3-229, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9

H. W. Chesbrough, « The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol.44, pp.3-35, 2003.

D. Chiaroni, D. Chiese, F. Et-frattini, and . Management, Unravelling the process from Closed to Open Innovation: evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries, R&D Management, vol.36, issue.3, pp.3-222, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00589.x

N. Chomsky, Syntactic structures, The Hague, 1957.

N. Chomsky, M. Cambridge, and M. , Aspects of the theory of syntax, Research laboratory of electronics (dir, 1965.

N. Chomsky, Cartesian linguistics, a chapter in the history of rationalist thought, 1966.

N. Chomsky, La linguistique cartésienne : un chapitre de l'histoire de la pensée rationaliste, 1969.

N. Chomsky, Aspects de la théorie syntaxique, 1971.

R. P. Clagett, Receptivity to innovation ? overcoming N.I, 1967.

F. S. Clark, Zeitgeist and Zerrbild : word, image and idea in german satire, 2006.

P. Bern and . Lang, Britische und irische Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur

S. Clegg, Modern organizations. Organization studies in the postmodern world, 1990.

W. M. Cohen and D. A. Et-levinthal, « Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.35, pp.1-128, 1990.

P. E. Connor and B. B. Becker, Values and the Organization: Suggestions for Research., Academy of Management Journal, vol.18, issue.3, pp.3-550, 1975.
DOI : 10.2307/255684

J. W. Creswell, Qualitative inquiry and research design : choosing among five approaches, 2007.

M. Crozier and E. Et-friedberg, L'Acteur et le système : les contraintes de l'action collective, 1977.

S. Curtis, W. Gesler, G. Smith, and S. Et-washburn, Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health, Social Science & Medicine, vol.50, issue.7-8, pp.1001-1014, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00350-0

R. M. Cyert and J. G. Et-march, A behavioral theory of the firm, 1963.

L. Dahlander and D. M. Et-gann, « How open is innovation?, Research Policy, vol.39, pp.6-699, 2010.

F. Damanpour, ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS OF DETERMINANTS AND MODERATORS., Academy of Management Journal, vol.34, issue.3, pp.3-555, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/256406

B. Danermark, M. Ekström, L. Jakobsen, and J. C. Et-karlsson, Explaining society : critical realism in the social sciences, realism: Interventions, 2002.

A. David, « Logique, épistémologie et méthodologie en sciences de gestion : trois hypothèses revisitées Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion : éléments d'épistémologie de la recherche en management, pp.83-109, 2001.

A. Degenne and P. Vergès, Introduction a l'analyse de similitude, Revue Française de Sociologie, pp.471-512, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/3320247

P. Delattre, La notion de système dans les sciences contemporaines, Aix-en-Provence, Librairie de l'Université, Théorie des systèmes et épistémologie Actes du colloque C.N.R.S. de Lyon-Villeurbanne (INSA) organisé en mars 1980 sur le thème « La contribution des disciplines scientifiques à la notion de système convergences et divergences », pp.1-81, 1982.

N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Et-lincoln, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 2011.

J. R. Detert, R. G. Schroeder, and J. J. Mauriel, « A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations, Academy of Management Review, vol.25, pp.4-850, 2000.

M. Dodgson, D. Gann, A. Salter, &. Procter, ». Gamble et al., « The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation : the case of, pp.3-333, 2006.

Q. Domart and S. Et-benz, « Les Trophées du Management de l'innovation », L'Expansion, 2011.

L. Donaldson, The contingency theory of organizations, 2001.
DOI : 10.4135/9781452229249

D. ». Dougherty, S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, R. Walter, and . Nord, Handbook of organization studies, Organizing for innovation, pp.424-439, 2002.

R. Drazin, M. A. Glynn, and R. K. Et-kazanjian, « Dynamics of structural change Handbook of organizational change and innovation, pp.161-189, 2004.

R. Drazin and L. Et-sandelands, Autogenesis: A Perspective on the Process of Organizing, Organization Science, vol.3, issue.2, pp.2-230, 1992.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.3.2.230

C. Drucker-godard, S. Ehlinger, and C. Et-grenier, « Validité et fiabilité de la recherche, Méthodes de recherche en management, pp.263-293, 2007.

F. Dubois-charlier and B. Et-vautherin, « La grammaire générative et transformationnelle : bref historique », 2008.

H. Dumez, « Les trois risques épistémologiques de la recherche qualitative (Réponse à Marie-José Avenier et Catherine Thomas) », Le Libellio d'Aegis, pp.4-29, 2012.

É. Durkheim, Les règles de la méthode sociologique, 1895.

D. Easton, The political system, an inquiry into the state of political science, 1953.

U. Eco, L'oeuvre ouverte, 1965.

U. Eco, Semiotics and the philosophy of language, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9

K. M. Eisenhardt, « Building theories from case study research, Academy of Management Review, vol.14, issue.4, pp.532-550, 1989.

M. Elmquist, T. Fredberg, and S. Et-ollila, Exploring the field of open innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol.12, issue.3, pp.3-326, 2009.
DOI : 10.1108/14601060910974219

O. Gassmann and E. Et-enkel, « Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes, Proceedings of The R&D Management Conference, 2004.

M. Gavard-perret, D. Gotteland, C. Haon, A. Helme-guizon, M. Hebert et al., Méthodologie de la recherche en sciences de gestion, Collecter les données par enquête, pp.107-164, 2012.

J. Gerring, Case study research : principles and practices, 2007.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511803123

C. J. Gersick, REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM, Academy of Management Review, vol.16, issue.1, pp.1-10, 1991.
DOI : 10.5465/AMR.1991.4278988

R. Grandy, The philosophy of science. An encyclopedia, pp.419-431, 2006.

G. Thornton, « Innovation : the key to future success?, 2009.

E. G. Guba and Y. S. Et-lincoln, « Competing paradigms in qualitative research, Handbook of qualitative research, pp.105-117, 1994.

E. Gummesson, Qualitative methods in management research, 2000.

J. Hage, An Axiomatic Theory of Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.10, issue.3, pp.3-289, 1965.
DOI : 10.2307/2391470

J. Hage, Communication and organizational control : cybernetics in health and welfare settings, 1974.

J. Hage, Theories of organizations : form, process, and transformation, 1980.

J. Hage, ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, Annual Review of Sociology, vol.25, issue.1, pp.597-622, 1999.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.597

A. D. Hall and R. E. Et-fagen, « Definition of system », in Society for the Advancement of General Systems Theory, Society for General Systems Research General systems : yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General Systems Theory, International Society for the Systems Sciences et International Society for General Systems Research (dir.), pp.18-28, 1956.

R. H. Hall, Organizations : structures, processes and outcomes, 1991.

G. Hardcastle, The philosophy of science. An encyclopedia, Logical empiricism, pp.458-465, 2006.

M. J. Hatch, Organization theory : modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives, 1997.

L. Heracleous and M. Barrett, « Ooganizational change as discourse : communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation, pp.4-755, 2001.

F. Heylighen and C. Et-joslyn, « Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics Encyclopedia of physical science and technology, pp.155-169, 2002.

E. Hippel and . Von, Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts, Management Science, vol.32, issue.7, pp.791-805, 1986.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791

E. Hippel and . Von, The Sources of Innovation, 1988.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_10

E. Hippel and . Von, Democratizing innovation, 2005.

E. V. Hippel, The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process, Research Policy, vol.5, issue.3, pp.212-239, 1976.
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7

T. Hofweber, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Logic and ontology » Edward N. Zalta (dir.), 2013.

C. Hopf, « What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field A companion to qualitative research, pp.334-339, 2004.

G. P. Huber, The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations, Management Science, vol.30, issue.8, pp.8-928, 1984.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.30.8.928

E. K. Huizingh, Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives, Technovation, vol.31, issue.1, pp.1-2, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002

K. Hussinger and A. Et-wastyn, In search for the not-invented-here syndrome: the role of knowledge sources and firm success, R&D Management, vol.18, issue.2, pp.11-048, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/radm.12136

L. Huston and N. Et-sakkab, « Connect and develop : inside Procter&Gamble's new model for innovation, Harvard Business Review, pp.1-8, 2006.

J. J. Jansen, D. Bosch, F. A. Van, and H. W. Volberda, Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators, Management Science, vol.52, issue.11, pp.11-1661, 2006.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576

B. Jaruzelski and K. Et-dehoff, « The customer connection : the global innovation 1000, 2007.

I. Jarvie, « Popper's ideal type : open and closed, abstract and concrete societies Popper's open society after fifty years, pp.71-82, 1999.

R. Katz and T. J. Et-allen, « Organizational issues in the introduction of new technologies The management of productivity and technology in manufacturing, pp.275-300, 1985.

R. Katz and T. J. Et-allen, NIH) syndrome : a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups, « Investigating the Not Invented Here, pp.1-7, 1982.

P. N. Khandwalla, « Environment and its impact on the organization », International Studies of Management & Organization, pp.3-297, 1972.

S. Khazanchi, M. W. Lewis, and K. K. Boyer, Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation, Journal of Operations Management, vol.25, issue.4, pp.871-884, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003

L. H. Kidder and M. Et-fine, Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge, Multiple Methods in Program Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, pp.35-57, 1987.
DOI : 10.1002/ev.1459

R. Kirschbaum, « Open innovation in practice, Research Technology Management, vol.48, issue.4, pp.24-28, 2005.

G. J. Klir, Facets of systems science International Federation for Systems Research international series on systems science and engineering, 1991.

G. J. Klir, Facets of systems science International Federation for Systems Research international series on systems science and engineering, p.15, 2001.

J. Knudson, « The influence of the German concepts of Volksgeist and Zeitgeist on the thought and jurisprudence of Oliver Wendell Holme, Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, vol.11, pp.2-407, 2002.

R. Kocourek, Essais de linguistique française et anglaise : mots et termes, sens et textes, 2001.

T. S. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions, 1962.

I. Lakatos and A. Et-musgrave, Criticism and the growth of knowledge, Proceedings of the International colloquium in the philosophy of science, 1965.

A. Lam, C. David, R. R. Mowery, and . Nelson, The Oxford handbook of innovation, pp.115-147, 2006.

J. O. Lanjouw, « Patent protection: of what value and for how long? », working paper n°4475, The National Bureau of Economic Research, 1993.

R. Larsson and B. R. Et-lowendahl, « The qualitative side of management research : a meta-analysis of espoused and used case study methodologies », 1996.

A. Laszlo and S. Et-krippner, « Systems theories : their origins, foundations, and development Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception, pp.47-74, 1998.

P. R. Lawrence and J. W. Et-lorsch, Organization and environment; managing differentiation and integration, 1967.

T. W. Lee, Using qualitative methods in organizational research, 1999.

R. Leifer and G. P. Et-huber, Relations Among Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Organization Structure, and Boundary-Spanning Behavior, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.22, issue.2, pp.2-235, 1977.
DOI : 10.2307/2391958

R. Leifer, S. Lee, and J. Et-durgee, Deep structures: Real information requirements determination, Information & Management, vol.27, issue.5, pp.5-275, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-7206(94)90022-1

M. Lessard-hébert, G. Goyette, and G. Et-boutin, La recherche qualitative : fondements et pratiques, 1997.

L. Lessig, The future of ideas : the fate of the commons in a connected world, 2001.

L. Lessig, Free culture : how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity, 2004.

L. Lessig, L'avenir des idées : le sort des biens communs à l'heure des réseaux numériques, 2005.

P. Lévy, L'intelligence collective : pour une anthropologie du cyberspace, 1994.

U. Lichtenthaler, H. Et-ernst, and . Management, Attitudes to externally organising knowledge management tasks: a review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome, R and D Management, vol.27, issue.4, pp.4-367, 2006.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780

J. G. March, Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science, vol.2, issue.1, pp.1-71, 1991.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

C. C. Markides and P. J. Et-williamson, CORPORATE DIVERSIFICATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW., Academy of Management Journal, vol.39, issue.2, pp.2-340, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/256783

C. Marshall and G. B. Et-rossman, Designing qualitative research, 1995.

M. Masterman, Criticism and the growth of knowledge, Imre Lakatos et Alan Musgrave Proceedings of the International colloquium in the philosophy of science, pp.59-89, 1965.

A. L. Melcher, Structure and processes of organizations : a systems approach, 1976.

C. Mele, J. Pels, and F. Et-polese, A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications, Service Science, vol.2, issue.1-2, pp.126-135, 2010.
DOI : 10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126

M. W. Meyer, The Two Authority Structures of Bureaucratic Organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.13, issue.2, pp.2-211, 1968.
DOI : 10.2307/2391452

R. L. Miller, « Abduction and retroduction The A-Z of social research, pp.1-4, 2003.

E. Miron, M. Erez, and E. Et-naveh, Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other?, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol.25, issue.2, pp.175-199, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/job.237

J. Moigne and . Le, « Systémique et épistémologie La notion de système dans les sciences contemporaines, Aix-en-Provence, Librairie de l'Université, Actes du colloque C.N.R.S. de Lyon-Villeurbanne (INSA) organisé en mars 1980 sur le thème « La contribution des disciplines scientifiques à la notion de système convergences et divergences », pp.149-317, 1982.

J. Moigne and . Le, « Épistémologies constructivistes et sciences de l'organisation, Épistémologies et sciences de gestion, pp.81-140, 1990.

J. Moigne and . Le, La théorie du système général : théorie de la modélisation, 1994.

M. J. Mol and J. Et-birkinshaw, The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices, Journal of Business Research, vol.62, issue.12, pp.12-1269, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001

P. Morand and D. Et-manceau, « Pour une nouvelle vision de l'innovation, de l'Economie, 2009.

P. K. Moser, A. Nat, and . Vander, Human knowledge. Classical and contemporary approaches, 2003.

R. R. Nelson, International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime, Linkages between the market economy and the scientific commons, pp.121-138, 2005.

O. Hear and A. , « The open society revisited, Karl Popper : critical appraisals, p.235, 2004.

. Manuel, Oslo : principes directeurs pour le recueil et l'interpétation des données sur l'innovation

T. Parsons, The social system, 1951.

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks, 2002.

J. Pénin, « More open than open innovation ? Rethinking the concept of openness in innovation studies, d'économie théorique et appliquée (BETA), 2008.

J. Pfeffer, Organizational design, 1978.

J. Pfeffer and H. Et-leblebici, Executive Recruitment and the Development of Interfirm Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.18, issue.4, pp.449-461, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/2392198

K. R. Popper, The open society and its enemies, 1945.

K. R. Popper, The open society and its enemies, 1945.

D. V. Porpora, « Four concepts of social structure, Critical realism : essential readings, pp.339-355, 1998.

I. Prigogine, P. M. Allen, and R. Herman, « Long-term trends and the evolution of complexity Goals in a global community : the original background papers for Goals for mankind, a report to the Club of Rome, pp.1-26, 1977.

D. S. Pugh, D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings, and C. Turner, The Context of Organization Structures, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.14, issue.1, pp.1-91, 1969.
DOI : 10.2307/2391366

R. E. Quinn and J. Et-rohrbaugh, A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis, Management Science, vol.29, issue.3, pp.3-363, 1983.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363

A. R. Radcliffe-brown, A natural science of society, 1957.

S. Ranson, B. Hinings, and R. Et-greenwood, The Structuring of Organizational Structures, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.25, issue.1, pp.1-1, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/2392223

J. Reichertz, « Abduction, deduction and induction in qualitative research, pp.159-164, 2004.

D. Remon, Innovation ouverte en contexte de PME : rôle des capacités et de l'innovation organisationnelles, Thèse de doctorat, 2010.

H. Rheingold, The virtual community : homesteading on the electronic frontier, 1993.

E. B. Roberts, « Stimulating technological innovations : organizational approaches, Research Management, vol.22, pp.26-30, 1979.

N. Rotenstreich, « Zeitgeist », Dictionary of the history of ideas. Studies of selected pivotal ideas, pp.535-537, 1973.

D. M. Rousseau, Characteristics of Departments, Positions, and Individuals: Contexts for Attitudes and Behavior, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.23, issue.4, pp.4-521, 1978.
DOI : 10.2307/2392578

J. Rowley, Using case studies in research, Management Research News, vol.25, issue.1, pp.16-27, 2002.
DOI : 10.1108/01409170210782990

F. Sachwald, « Réseaux mondiaux d'innovation ouverte, systèmes nationaux et politiques publiques, 2008.

M. Sakakibara, HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES, Strategic Management Journal, vol.18, issue.S1, pp.1-143, 1997.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<143::AID-SMJ927>3.3.CO;2-P

A. Sayer, Realism and social science, 2000.
DOI : 10.4135/9781446218730

D. Schlagwein, K. Fischbach, D. Schoder, and S. Et-bartsch, Open value creation, Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, MEDES '10, pp.691-703, 2010.
DOI : 10.1145/1936254.1936303

A. Schroll and A. Et-mild, Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol.14, issue.4, pp.4-475, 2011.
DOI : 10.1108/14601061111174925

J. Scott, Environmental research joint ventures among manufactures, Review of Industrial Organization, vol.48, issue.688, pp.655-679, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00214828

R. W. Scott, Organizations : rational, natural and open systems, 1992.

J. W. Sewell, A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation, American Journal of Sociology, vol.98, issue.1, pp.1-1, 1992.
DOI : 10.1086/229967

J. O. Shallit, « A very brief history of computer science », 1995.

Y. Shenhav, « The historical and epistemological foundations of organization theory. Fusing sociological theory with engineering discourse The Oxford handbook of organization theory, pp.183-209, 2003.

W. A. Sheremata, « Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure, Academy of Management Review, vol.25, pp.2-389, 2000.

H. Simons, Case study research in practice, 2009.
DOI : 10.4135/9781446268322

M. Soulet, « Traces et intuition raisonnée, La méthodologie qualitative. Postures de recherche et travail de terrain, pp.125-149, 2006.

J. W. Spencer, Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry, Strategic Management Journal, vol.48, issue.3, pp.3-217, 2003.
DOI : 10.1002/smj.290

R. E. Stake, Handbook of qualitative research, Case studies, pp.435-454, 2000.

R. M. Stallman, Free software, free society: selected essays of, 2010.

W. H. Starbuck, « The origins of organization theory The Oxford handbook of organization theory, pp.143-182, 2003.

R. Stones, « Structure and agency », The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology, pp.4861-4864, 2007.

J. Surowiecki, The wisdom of crowds : why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations, 2004.

T. Szuba, P. Pola?ski, P. Schab, and P. Et-wielicki, On Efficiency of Collective Intelligence Phenomena, Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence, pp.50-72, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-19968-4_3

S. J. Taylor and R. Et-bogdan, Introduction to qualitative research methods : a guidebook and ressource, 1998.

D. J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Et-shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, pp.509-533, 1997.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

J. Tidd, Innovation management in context: environment, organization and performance, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol.3, issue.3, pp.3-169, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-2370.00062

E. Trist, « Organisation et système Quelques remarques théoriques se rapportant plus particulièrement aux recherches d'Andras Angyal », Revue française de sociologie, pp.1-123, 1970.

P. Trott and D. Et-hartmann, WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES, International Journal of Innovation Management, vol.13, issue.04, pp.4-715, 2009.
DOI : 10.1142/S1363919609002509

D. P. Truex and R. Et-baskerville, Deep structure or emergence theory: contrasting theoretical foundations for information systems development, Information Systems Journal, vol.8, issue.2, pp.99-118, 1998.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-2575.1998.00029.x

M. L. Tushman and E. Et-romanelli, « Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis of convergence and reorientation, Research in Organizational Behavior, pp.171-222, 1985.

A. H. Ven and . Van-de, Engaged scholarship : a guide for organizational and social research, 2007.

V. Vrande, J. J. Van-de, . De, W. Vanhaverbeke, M. Et-rochemont et al., Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges, Technovation, vol.29, issue.6-7, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001

J. Vullierme, Le concept de système politique, 1989.

F. Wacheux, Méthodes qualitatives et recherche en gestion, 1996.

J. West and S. Gallagher, Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software, R&D Management, pp.3-319, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00052-0

A. Wilden, System and structure : essays in communication and exchange, 1972.

A. Wilden, System and structure : essays in communication and exchange, 2001.

C. Willig, Introducing qualitative research in psychology : adventures in theory and method, 2008.

F. P. Wilson, The Oxford dictionary of English proverbs, 1970.

R. K. Yin, Case study research : design and methods, 2009.

R. W. Zmud, « Diffusion of modern softare practices : influence of centralization and formalization, Management Science, vol.28, pp.12-1421, 1982.

M. Zollo and S. G. Winter, Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities, Organization Science, vol.13, issue.3, pp.3-339, 2002.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780

. Ainsi, ensemble du schéma de codage (156 codes) ainsi que l'ensemble d'unités de texte codées (433 unités de texte) Nous avons calculé ensuite le pourcentage d'accord selon la formule : Il y a eu 433 de cas d'accord et désaccord (soit le nombre total d'unités de texte)

. Selon-la-formule-indiquée, 9 % ce qui nous conforte dans notre entreprise de codage. Pour ce qui est des désaccords, nous les avons résolus soit en modifiant le niveau de codage de l'unité de texte, soit en supprimant le code (3 cas), soit en maintenant notre codage initial