L. Amgoud and J. Ben-naim, Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs, 14th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, pp.25-35, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02325836

S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases, Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI, pp.411-419, 1993.

L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol.34, issue.1-3, pp.197-215, 2002.

T. Bench-capon, Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.13, issue.3, pp.429-448, 2003.

C. Da-costa-pereira, A. Tettamanzi, and S. Villata, Changing one's mind: Erase or rewind?, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, pp.164-171, 2011.

P. M. Dung, On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games, Artif. Intel, vol.77, pp.321-357, 1995.

P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida, Scc-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics, Artificial Intelligence, vol.168, pp.162-210, 2005.

P. Dung, P. Mancarella, and F. Toni, Computing ideal skeptical argumentation, Artificial Intelligence, vol.171, pp.642-674, 2007.

S. , Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, issue.9, pp.901-934, 2009.

C. Cayrol, C. Devred, and M. Lagasquie-schiex, Acceptability semantics accounting for strength of attacks in argumentation, Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI, pp.995-996, 2010.

P. E. Dunne, A. Hunter, P. Mcburney, S. Parsons, and M. Wooldridge, Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results, Artificial Intelligence, vol.175, issue.2, pp.457-486, 2011.

P. Dunne, D. Martinez, A. Garcia, and G. Simari, Computation with variedstrength attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks, Semi-Stable Semantics, pp.207-218, 2010.

M. C. Budán, M. L. Cobo, D. Marténez, and G. Simari, Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.84, pp.1-22, 2017.

C. Cayrol and M. Lagasquie-schiex, On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks, pp.378-389, 2005.

N. Oren and T. Norman, Semantics for evidence-based argumentation, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp.276-284, 2008.

G. Brewka and S. Woltran, Abstract dialectical frameworks, Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2010.

G. Boella, D. M. Gabbay, L. Van-der-torre, and S. Villata, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp.111-122, 2010.

F. Nouioua and V. Risch, Bipolar argumentation frameworks with specialized supports, International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI, pp.215-218, 2010.

L. Amgoud and J. Ben-naim, Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM, pp.134-147, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01239719

L. Amgoud, J. Ben-naim, D. Doder, and S. Vesic, Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks, Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.56-62, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02326004

P. Besnard and A. Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments, Artificial Intelligence, vol.128, issue.1, pp.203-235, 2001.

P. Baroni, M. Romano, F. Toni, M. Aurisicchio, and G. Bertanza, Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation, Argument & Computation, vol.6, issue.1, pp.24-49, 2015.

A. Rago, F. Toni, M. Aurisicchio, and P. Baroni, Discontinuity-free decision support with quantitative argumentation debate, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp.63-73, 2016.

C. Cayrol and M. Lagasquie-schiex, Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks, pp.366-377, 2005.

L. Amgoud and J. Ben-naim, Evaluation of arguments from support relations: Axioms and semantics, Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, pp.900-906, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01530271

L. Amgoud and J. Ben-naim, Axiomatic foundations of acceptability semantics, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp.2-11, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01531176

J. Pollock, How to reason defeasibly, Artificial Intelligence Journal, vol.57, issue.1, pp.1-42, 1992.

L. Amgoud and H. Prade, Using arguments for making and explaining decisions, Artificial Intelligence, vol.173, pp.413-436, 2009.

D. Dubois, H. Fargier, and J. Bonnefon, On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol.32, pp.385-417, 2008.

C. Cayrol and M. Lagasquie-schiex, Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: Towards a better understanding, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.54, issue.7, pp.876-899, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123535

F. Nouioua and V. Risch, Argumentation frameworks with necessities, International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, SUM, pp.163-176, 2011.

V. Evripidou and F. Toni, Quaestio-it.com: a social intelligent debating platform, Journal of Decision Systems, vol.23, issue.3, pp.333-349, 2014.

T. Mossakowski and F. Neuhaus, Bipolar weighted argumentation graphs

C. Cayrol and M. Lagasquie-schiex, Graduality in Argumentation, vol.23, pp.245-297, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01925532

D. Grossi and S. Modgil, On the graded acceptability of arguments, Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.868-874, 2015.

S. Modgil and H. Prakken, A general account of argumentation with preferences, Artificial Intelligence, vol.195, pp.361-397, 2013.

H. Prakken and G. Sartor, Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.7, issue.1, pp.25-75, 1997.