Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

SHOULD In Conditional Clauses: When Epistemicity Meet Appreciative Modality

Abstract : SHOULD can have two seemingly opposite epistemic values, depending on whether it occurs in a conditional clause or in a main clause: Labour should win the election. If Labour should win the election, what would you do? In the first example, SHOULD expresses both likelihood and the positive expectation of a Labour victory; conversely, in the second example SHOULD carries both a sense of unlikelihood and the negative apprehension of a Labour victory. I propose to account for this semantic alternation by a two-pronged approach: on the one hand, SHOULD will be analyzed as a marker that expresses the speaker’s point of view by qualifying the event as epistemically (un)expected and/or subjectively (un)desirable. On the other hand, IF-conditional clauses will be analyzed as suspending the speaker’s endorsement. The combination of the two results in the primary value of SHOULD being reversed.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Lionel Dufaye Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, June 19, 2017 - 2:53:36 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, January 15, 2022 - 4:05:33 AM


  • HAL Id : hal-01541921, version 1



Lionel Dufaye. SHOULD In Conditional Clauses: When Epistemicity Meet Appreciative Modality. Vers Une Typologie des modalités, 2017, Vers Une Typologie des modalités. ⟨hal-01541921⟩



Record views