Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Measuring Disagreement in Argumentation Graphs

Abstract : The aim of this paper is to evaluate to what extent an argumentation graph (a set of arguments and attacks between them) is conflicting. For that purpose , we introduce the novel notion of disagreement measure as well as a set of principles that such a measure should satisfy. We propose some intuitive measures and show that they fail to satisfy some of the principles. Then, we come up with a more discriminating measure which satisfies them all. Finally, we relate some measures to those quantifying inconsistency in knowledge bases.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [16 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02326011
Contributor : Leila Amgoud <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, October 22, 2019 - 1:38:10 PM
Last modification on : Friday, June 12, 2020 - 3:52:38 AM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Thursday, January 23, 2020 - 9:44:19 PM

File

Measures.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02326011, version 1

Citation

Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim. Measuring Disagreement in Argumentation Graphs. 11th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, Oct 2017, Grenade, Spain. ⟨hal-02326011⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

59

Files downloads

105